JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 15, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo

✓Claimant Erlinto Franciso Ceron Santacruz Y Otros

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Se rechaza por no cumplir con el presupuesto formal de carga argumentativa suficiente
  • Requisitos formales y materiales de procedencia
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-313/19.

Los peticionarios alegaron que la providencia de la referencia hizo caso omiso del examen de todos los argumentos expuestos y desconoció que existía cosa juzgada constitucional.

Teniendo en cuenta que ninguno de los cargos formulados cumplió con la carga argumentativa necesaria para estructurar un verdadero cargo de nulidad, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió RECHAZAR el incidente invocado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR la solicitud de nulidad presentada por Harold Mosquera Rivas, actuando como apoderado de los senores Erlinto Francisco Ceron Santacruz, Brigida Natalia Benavides de Hidalgo, Bertha Cecilia Lagos Hidalgo, Jose Ignacio Rosero Diaz, Omary del Socorro Ortega, Elsy Lidia Gorlato Arroyo y Alfredo Froilan Narvaez, en contra la Sentencia T-313 de 2019, proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revision de la Corte Constitucional el 15 de julio de 2019.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Antonio José Lizarazo Ocampo
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Carlos Libardo Bernal Pulido
Magistrado
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Presidente
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.